🔗 Share this article Families' Anguish Regarding Shoreline Degradation Threatening Norfolk Graves Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones. An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations. A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward. “Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.” Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said. Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard. “You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.” “I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.” A Soldier's Grave in Peril Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated. “It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.” She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.” Searching for Solutions and Clarity The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried. Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching. “The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.” A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.” It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.” “There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.” The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.