🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts about the comments made by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's win over Taylor Fritz during the US Open last eight. Look – the athlete represents American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions often encourage patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment was appropriate. Instead, Fowler invoked the continued absence of US male players at the majors: none of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, me too. But really. Suppose Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the first time, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the following match, who he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven grand slams (plus the Spaniard went on to thrash a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in press after the loss that he in fact liked his draw, because it presented the opportunity to beat the three best competitors in the sport in succession. Fritz is well justified to aspire to the achievement; an competitor is supposed to believe in themselves. But going into that Serbian quarter-final who else in their right mind had the lack of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

The American, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the global rankings starting this week’s year-end championships and has won his previous six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that’s as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class serve and powerful power on both forehand and backhand are sufficiently adequate to dispose of the majority of rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the select few generational talents, however, he is frequently overmatched. The last several seasons has seen the curious emergence of tall, gangly athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming speed and fluidity of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite harsh restriction on his potential.

Fritz has made a several significant, unexpected improvements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. Two years after, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he suddenly surged up to No 4 – and held the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could Fowler thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing slump of US male players winning major titles when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best run to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that very quarter-final ought to have been enough of an indication. The Serbian triumphed in four sets, a victory that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning numerous opportunities to break. But the champion rescued break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly played a terrible game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and compelled him to use far too much effort to prevail. Down set points in the last game, Fritz’s primary delivery floated to heaven. He extended the contest twice on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It was not a collapse, I didn’t think, only a consequence of having to hit too many second serves.

The contest was fairly compelling proof that the American is not good enough to defeat any version of Djokovic, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and did not particularly appeared like he believed he could win. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has developed enough experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in press conferences, more so than virtually everyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not just say his emotions or the tactic he felt decided a match, but explain it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick feels unfair. (Now that the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely dwell on it indefinitely if I fail to do it,” Fritz informed a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he does not fulfill that goal, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying reign is actually highly improbable for all other players. {